mel,
raise the red lantern is about ownership and allocation. for the gen 5ers
making films was like writing for pravda. they could, they had to (to be
seen as credible both in the own eyes and the eyes of those abroad)
criticize the gov't, the CCP and the red army. the sensors would cut out or
ban anything obvious, so they had to be subtle. their films, including RTRL,
are allegorical, but not in the 1:1 snowball=trotsky of propagandic or
didactic allegory. the subtlely's a sticky thing, im not gonna get into it
on this crappy a keyboard, but think about RTRL as an emotional-affective
recapitulation of the cultural revolution, and the very idea of forced
cultural adaptation in general. ownership in the CR was an ownership of
authority; the communes and the co-ops werent everyone owning everything,
they were no one owning anything, except the person who had the authority to
give someone permission to use "public" property or assets. the women being
played off each other by their husband are, in some microcosmic and NOT 1:1
correlating way, representative (or at least indicative/explicative) of mao
playing the red guard and the red army off the ccp, the businessmen, the
intellectuals, etc., who were purged for the threat they posed to mao's
power base. the women in the flick are reified into sources of
entertainment; the esteem is calculated on the base of their worth, their
worth on the ability to please their mutual husband. (reification is gonna
show as misapplied via the singer's affair w/ the doctor, a manifestation of
sincere emotions on her part.) if the four wives were left to their own
devices they'd fall into a (perhaps shifting) hierarchy of
influence/affluence, but since the husband, via old family tradition, can
not only keep them in constant contention w/ one another, but actually break
one's base of influence entirely (as when he learns li gong's pregnancy is
phony) to reset the pieces (clear the board, level the playing field, any
other idiom of yr choice). the fact that's it a red lantern is telling, but
not definitive; red has ceremonial significance in various chinese
traditions, it's a color associated with both violence and lust, while only
the emperor could wear yellow (not red), the emperor wrote in red, not black
(hence using red to both demarcate, which is the basis of language, and to
decree, which is the method of authority). .... i could go on.
nate
...and there's something to be said for the impartation of vitality and lanterns as such, for the rest a
y'all, for the resta for now, for sha.